Study Reveals American Teens Oppose Stricter Social Media Regulations
A recent study conducted by the Stanford Deliberative Democracy Lab has highlighted a notable resistance among American teens towards proposed social media regulations.
The poll, involving 430 first-time voters, reveals that over 60% oppose mandatory parental consent for those under 16 to use social media platforms. Additionally, more than 85% of respondents reject any restrictions on the timing of social media notifications.
Generation Z remains largely against government-imposed limits on their online activities. This demographic, comprising individuals aged 17 to 19 is increasingly influential and aware of social issues whilst also having the strongest attachment to social media in general. Similar sentiments can also be found in users as old as 27.
The poll, part of the “America in One Room: The Youth Vote” project, found that while teens are aware of the risks associated with social media, they prefer parental discretion over broad government regulations. Researchers found that none of the proposed restrictions, including age requirements and time limits, received majority support from the participants.
The resistance to regulations is not a sign of trust in social media companies, as less than 10% of first-time voters express confidence in these platforms’ commitment to user safety. Instead, it reflects a preference for parental rather than governmental control and an acknowledgment of social media’s role as a critical support network for young people.
This study highlights a complex stance among Gen Z regarding social media—while they recognize its risks, they favor maintaining autonomy over their digital lives.